MOS Technology SID: Difference between revisions

Rescuing 4 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.3
No edit summary
(Rescuing 4 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.3)
Line 13:
There are also sound differences. The filter of the 6581 sounds more moody and dirty, while the 8580/6582 filter sounds more precisely. Resonance has nearly no effect on the 6581, some mixed waveforms are not working, and it has a much higher background noise. The 8580/6582 is normally the preferred choice.<ref name="um" />
 
''See also [https://web.archive.org/web/20121031133833/http://sid.kubarth.com/sound_comparison.html SID sound comparison].''
 
== Hardware emulation ==
The [https://web.archive.org/web/20140722224348/http://www.swinkels.tvtom.pl/swinsid/ SwinSID] is designed to be a pin compatible replacement module for both versions of the SID IC. Based on the [[Atmel AVR]] [[microcontroller]] It does not sound exactlty the same as either of the original ICs.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20140722224348/http://www.swinkels.tvtom.pl/swinsid/ About SwinSID]</ref>
 
== References ==
Line 24:
* [http://kevtris.org/Projects/sid/remarked_sids.html Remarked SID Chips Sold as New]
* Wikipedia:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOS_Technology_SID MOS Technology SID]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20130521112326/http://sid.kubarth.com/ SID in-depth information page]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120226010021/http://soundprogramming.net/electronics_reference/manuals/6581datasheet.pdf Commodore SID 6581 Datasheet]
* [http://www.linusakesson.net/chipophone/pages.php Chipophone]