Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta14)) |
(Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0) |
||
Line 37:
* [http://www.accutronicsreverb.com/ Accutronics] have been a major player for many years, but have recently been taken over by Belton.
* The [https://web.archive.org/web/20130616164602/http://www.belton.co.kr/index.php?mm_code=75 Belton] range of tanks include many similar to the Accutronics units, but also include 'mini' tanks, which are favoured by some Eurorack makers' reverb modules.
* These [https://web.archive.org/web/20121028204959/http://www.tubeampdoctor.com/en/shop_Reverb_Cans_TAD_Reverb_Cans/ Tube Amp Doctor] tanks have recently come to light, with very similar looking tanks/specs to the other makes.
* Another brand of tanks has recently emerged – [https://web.archive.org/web/20111207133452/http://www.amplifiedparts.com/products/amp_parts?&filters=MOD+Reverb+Tanks MOD reverb tanks]. These are apparently meant to be clones of the early Accutronics tanks: they are made for [http://www.cedist.com/ CE Distribution], who also seem to be the same people as [http://www.tubesandmore.com/ Antique Electronic Supply ('tubesandmore.com')], and [http://www.modkitsdiy.com/ Mod Kits DIY], as well as [http://www.amplifiedparts.com/ Amplified Parts] – the similarities in the webpages are obvious, and the [https://web.archive.org/web/20120111214611/http://www.amplifiedparts.com/tech_corner/spring_reverb_tanks_explained_and_compared technical page] mentioned in the intro above is available at several of these sites, and also contains a summary comparison between the Accutronics, Belton, and MOD tanks.
=== Schematics ===
| |||